01
Check privacy and source readiness
You confirm that the material is de-identified, restricted test content is excluded, and every result has enough source context to review.
Made for Clinical Psychologists
Combine Interview Notes and Supplied Measures Without Overstating Results
Also useful for: Therapists, people in Healthcare
35 min
Intermediate
Healthcare
Get Organized
Organize supplied measure results beside relevant interview evidence, identify agreement and mismatch, preserve uncertainty, and draft a restrained summary for your clinical review.
We'll use them to write your prompt.
Completed ✓
Make Your Play
Give us the situation. We’ll build the prompt.
Scores and interview accounts don't always line up.
Your answers save as you type.
What you'll do
This is the plan inside your prompt. Add your details first. Then follow these steps with ChatGPT or Claude.
02
Extract the supplied measure facts
You turn each supplied measure result into a factual record without adding norms, cutoffs, or meaning that you didn't provide.
03
Sort the interview evidence
You organize interview material by concern, timing, setting, frequency, impact, exceptions, observation, and source.
04
Build the convergence map
You compare each measure finding with relevant interview evidence and classify the relationship without forcing agreement.
05
Turn gaps into assessment questions
You convert mismatches and missing evidence into focused questions that can guide further assessment.
06
Draft and stress-test the summary
You draft a restrained synthesis, then check each sentence for unsupported certainty or claims that exceed the supplied evidence.
Make Your Play
Combine Interview Notes and Supplied Measures Without Overstating Results
Tell us what the prompt needs to know
Start with the questions below. Each answer personalizes the playbook and builds the prompt you’ll use at the end.
Your situation
State the clinical question this integration should help clarify without asking the AI to make a diagnosis.
Paste de-identified interview findings, observations, timelines, functional examples, and source labels relevant to the question.
0/10000
List each measure's name, date, supplied scores, validity information, and interpretation already available to you. Exclude test items and restricted content.
0/10000
Describe administration conditions, timeframe, informant, comparison information, and any supplied interpretive guidance that affects how the results should be read.
0/10000
List missing records, uncertain dates, absent collateral reports, language or access concerns, validity questions, and other limits you already recognize.
0/10000
Select how you want the evidence map and integrated summary presented.
Select the statement that accurately confirms how you handled identifying information.
This playbook was updated. Review your inputs before copying.
What you'll do
Check a step when you finish it.
01
Check privacy and source readiness
You confirm that the material is de-identified, restricted test content is excluded, and every result has enough source context to review.
02
Extract the supplied measure facts
You turn each supplied measure result into a factual record without adding norms, cutoffs, or meaning that you didn't provide.
03
Sort the interview evidence
You organize interview material by concern, timing, setting, frequency, impact, exceptions, observation, and source.
04
Build the convergence map
You compare each measure finding with relevant interview evidence and classify the relationship without forcing agreement.
05
Turn gaps into assessment questions
You convert mismatches and missing evidence into focused questions that can guide further assessment.
06
Draft and stress-test the summary
You draft a restrained synthesis, then check each sentence for unsupported certainty or claims that exceed the supplied evidence.
Fill in the fields above to generate your prompt preview.
Assembled prompt
Beginner instructions
Remove direct identifiers before sharing material. Paste one measure at a time if the record is long. Check every AI statement against your source notes, scoring materials, and professional judgment before using it.
Advanced instructions
Add dates, settings, informants, validity indicators, and source labels when available. Ask for separate syntheses when different measures assess different timeframes or constructs. Keep the evidence map with your working notes so later conclusions remain traceable.
Use this when
Use this after an interview when you have scored or interpreted measure results supplied by you and need to integrate both sources into a case summary.
You'll need
- Presenting question
- Interview evidence
- Supplied measure results
- Measure context
- Known limits
- Output format
- Privacy check
You'll get
- A source-checked evidence map, an explicit list of conflicts and limits, targeted follow-up questions, and a draft summary that you have checked against the original material
- You can trace each conclusion to supplied evidence, and unanswered questions remain visible.
By the end of this playbook
You will have:
- A source-checked evidence map, an explicit list of conflicts and limits, targeted follow-up questions, and a draft summary that you have checked against the original material
- You can trace each conclusion to supplied evidence, and unanswered questions remain visible.
Examples
Progress 1 of 6