01
Build the project evidence base
Gather the facts that reveal where revenue, delivery effort, client results, repeat work, and proof actually align.
Made for Freelancers
Turn Past Projects Into a Profitable Position
Also useful for: people in Freelancers
45 min
Advanced
Business & Entrepreneurship
Earn More
Choose a focused freelance position using evidence from past projects, client demand, delivery costs, and proven results.
We'll use them to write your prompt.
Completed ✓
Make Your Play
Give us the situation. We’ll build the prompt.
Replace broad positioning guesses with a clear choice grounded in profitable work, repeat demand, credible proof, and delivery fit.
Your answers save as you type.
What you'll do
This is the plan inside your prompt. Add your details first. Then follow these steps with ChatGPT or Claude.
02
Rank viable position options
Use one scoring model to compare recurring combinations of client, problem, project type, proof, and delivery fit.
03
Choose the smartest position
Select the strongest evidence-backed position or define the test needed to resolve a close decision.
04
Put the position into use
Translate the decision into language and filters that shape marketing, qualification, and proposals.
Make Your Play
Turn Past Projects Into a Profitable Position
Tell us what the prompt needs to know
Start with the questions below. Each answer personalizes the playbook and builds the prompt you’ll use at the end.
Your situation
List three to ten past projects with the client type, problem, deliverables, collected fee, hours, direct costs, complications, result, repeat work, referral activity, and available proof.
0/10000
Describe the services offered now, typical pricing, available capacity, delivery limits, and work that drains time or creates scope problems.
0/10000
Describe the clients, problems, project structure, income pattern, and working conditions worth pursuing over the next year.
0/10000
Summarize recent inquiries, referrals, proposal outcomes, recurring requests, buyer objections, and signs that clients will pay for specific problems.
0/10000
This playbook was updated. Review your inputs before copying.
What you'll do
Check a step when you finish it.
01
Build the project evidence base
Gather the facts that reveal where revenue, delivery effort, client results, repeat work, and proof actually align.
02
Rank viable position options
Use one scoring model to compare recurring combinations of client, problem, project type, proof, and delivery fit.
03
Choose the smartest position
Select the strongest evidence-backed position or define the test needed to resolve a close decision.
04
Put the position into use
Translate the decision into language and filters that shape marketing, qualification, and proposals.
Fill in the fields above to generate your prompt preview.
Assembled prompt
Beginner instructions
Start with three to five completed projects. Estimates are acceptable when exact hours or costs aren’t available, but mark them clearly. Focus on what happened, not what the project was supposed to become.
Advanced instructions
Use collected fees rather than signed contract value when possible. Include unpaid sales, revision, coordination, and follow-up time in delivery effort. Challenge high-revenue projects that produced weak margins or depended on unusual access.
Use this when
Your services feel too broad, profitable projects seem inconsistent, or your positioning attracts inquiries that aren't worth taking.
You'll need
- Past project evidence
- Current services and constraints
- Preferred future work
- Market response
You'll get
- Past project evidence organized by problem, project type, economics, demand, and proof
- Position options scored against consistent decision factors
- One leading position selected or a specific tie-break test defined
- Best-fit and poor-fit work boundaries documented
- Positioning language and market tests ready to use.
By the end of this playbook
You will have:
- Past project evidence organized by problem, project type, economics, demand, and proof
- Position options scored against consistent decision factors
- One leading position selected or a specific tie-break test defined
- Best-fit and poor-fit work boundaries documented
- Positioning language and market tests ready to use.
Examples
Progress 1 of 4