01
Gather and label the evidence
You collect deidentified reports, observations, records, and measure results. You label each item by source, setting, time period, and evidence type.
Made for Clinical Psychologists
Clarify a Mixed or Contradictory Presentation
Also useful for: Therapists, people in Healthcare Professionals
25 min
Intermediate
Healthcare
Get Organized
Organize conflicting clinical information by source, setting, timing, and strength of support, then create a neutral summary without forcing an early conclusion.
We'll use them to write your prompt.
Completed ✓
Make Your Play
Give us the situation. We’ll build the prompt.
Mixed presentations can become hard to assess when reports disagree, behavior changes by setting, or the timeline is incomplete.
Your answers save as you type.
What you'll do
This is the plan inside your prompt. Add your details first. Then follow these steps with ChatGPT or Claude.
02
Map agreements and conflicts
You use the primary prompt to compare information without deciding too early which account is correct.
03
Test alternative explanations
You review each possible explanation against both supporting and conflicting information.
04
Finalize the next assessment move
You turn the analysis into neutral documentation and a short, prioritized follow-up plan.
Make Your Play
Clarify a Mixed or Contradictory Presentation
Tell us what the prompt needs to know
Start with the questions below. Each answer personalizes the playbook and builds the prompt you’ll use at the end.
Your situation
Describe the presenting concern, referral question, and decision this assessment needs to support.
0/10000
List the relevant reports or observations, naming the source, setting, and whether each item is reported, observed, or documented.
0/10000
Describe when each concern started, what changed, and any periods when the concern improved, worsened, or was absent.
0/10000
Enter relevant measure results, behavioral observations, validity cautions, medications, health factors, stressors, and contextual details without adding conclusions the data doesn't support.
0/10000
List missing records, unavailable sources, unclear dates, unanswered safety questions, or other limits affecting interpretation.
0/10000
This playbook was updated. Review your inputs before copying.
What you'll do
Check a step when you finish it.
01
Gather and label the evidence
You collect deidentified reports, observations, records, and measure results. You label each item by source, setting, time period, and evidence type.
02
Map agreements and conflicts
You use the primary prompt to compare information without deciding too early which account is correct.
03
Test alternative explanations
You review each possible explanation against both supporting and conflicting information.
04
Finalize the next assessment move
You turn the analysis into neutral documentation and a short, prioritized follow-up plan.
Fill in the fields above to generate your prompt preview.
Assembled prompt
Beginner instructions
Start with deidentified facts from your notes. Label who reported each point and where or when it occurred. If a detail is unknown, write “unknown” instead of filling the gap. Review the result against your source material before using any wording in a clinical record.
Advanced instructions
Use the evidence map to test whether an apparent contradiction could reflect context, informant access, recall, developmental expectations, response style, symptom fluctuation, or a true inconsistency. Adjust the follow-up priorities based on clinical urgency, assessment purpose, and the limits of each measure. Keep your own clinical judgment and local documentation standards in control.
Use this when
Use this after an intake, record review, collateral conversation, or measure review when the available information points in different directions or doesn't yet support a clear explanation.
You'll need
- Presenting concern
- Reports by source and setting
- Timeline and changes
- Measures and context
- Known gaps
You'll get
- An evidence map tied to sources and settings
- A neutral summary separating support, conflict, and uncertainty
- Prioritized questions or actions for further assessment
- Every statement checked against the supplied material.
By the end of this playbook
You will have:
- An evidence map tied to sources and settings
- A neutral summary separating support, conflict, and uncertainty
- Prioritized questions or actions for further assessment
- Every statement checked against the supplied material.
Examples
Progress 1 of 4